NSIP
Our field staff have a deep awareness that successful wildlife conservation is predicated on the sustainable governance of natural resources within any given landscape or seascape.  As a result, most of our conservation programs are engaged in strengthening local governance of wildlife, wildlife habitat and other natural resources, and are attempting to track whether their investments are having the desired positive impacts.

Up until now there have been no simple, low-cost, and replicable ways to measure and understand the strengths and weaknesses of governance groups with legitimate jurisdiction over the management of natural resources within a given landscape or seascape. 

Though there are myriad ways to evaluate governance, there are really three core attributes that predict good governance.  

1st, stakeholders must perceive the governance group to have the authority (i.e., governing in their interests). 

2nd, the governance group must have the capacity to govern (i.e., the skills and knowledge to develop and implement a conservation plan; the staff, financial resources and the regulatory framework to put their plans into action; and the motivation to make and enforce conservation rules and regulations). 

3rd, the governance group must have the power to exert their legitimate authority, use their capacity and not be undermined by other less legitimate but more politically or economically powerful actors.  

With this for guidance, WCS has lead an effort funded by the USAID SCAPES program to develop a low cost, expert-opinion tool to identify all the governance groups with formal or informal authority over natural resources within a landscape or seascape and evaluate their governance strengths and weakness in terms of their authority, capacity, and power to govern.

Deploying this measure will not only help WCS landscape and seascape staff identify which groups need our help to govern their natural resources better, it will help us to monitor and report how are efforts are strengthening wildlife governance in the landscape and seascapes where we work.


David S. Wilkie
Director, Conservation Measures
All Governance Metric Staff >>
Author(s): Detoeuf, D.; Wieland, M.; Cowles, P.; Wilkie, D.
Description/Abstract: Cette deuxième version comprend : a) une meilleure compréhension du pouvoir de gouverner et l’ajout de la diversité comme sous-attribut de l’autorité, b) une mise à jour des méthodes de collecte et de gestion des données à l’aide de KoboToolBox sur tablette informatique, et c) une révision de l’instrument d’enquête pour utiliser des réponses en échelle. Chacun de ces changements a été inspiré par une vaste expérience de terrain de la mise en oeuvre de la version 1 de l’Outil de Gouvernance des Ressources Naturelles (NRGT) en Afrique centrale et dans d’autres régions du monde.
Publisher: WCS; USAID
Author(s): Detoeuf, D.; Wieland, M.; Cowles, P.; Wilkie, D.
Description/Abstract: This second version incorporates: a) improved understanding of the power to govern and the addition of diversity as a sub-attribute of authority, b) updated data collection and data management methods using KoboToolBox on tablet computers, and c) revision of the survey instrument to use Likert scale responses. Each of these changes were informed by extensive field experience of implementing Version 1 of the Natural Resources Governance Tool (NRGT) in Central Africa and other locations around the world.
Publisher: WCS; USAID
Author(s): David Wilkie, Paul Cowles
Description/Abstract: Guide for an approach and a data collection tool that together constitute a relatively simple, low-cost, expert opinion-based, method for assessing governance strengths and weaknesses and how these change over time.
Publisher: U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)
Author(s): Detoeuf, D.;Wieland, M.; Wilkie, D.
Description/Abstract: This manual is offered as a practical guide to implementing the Basic Necessities Survey (BNS) that was originally developed by Rick Davies (http://mande.co.uk/special-issues/the-basic-necessities-survey/), and was modified and then field-tested by WCS. The modified Basic Necessities Survey is imperfect, in that it does not attempt to answer all questions that could be asked about the impact of conservation (or development) actions on people’s well-being. But it is the perfect core to a livelihood monitoring program, because it provides essential information about people’s well-being from their perspective over time, and implementing a modified BNS is easy enough that it does not preclude gathering additional household information that a conservation project feels they need to adaptively manage their activities.
Publisher: WCS
Author(s): D. Detoeuf; M. Wieland; D. Wilkie
Description/Abstract: Ce manuel est offert comme guide pratique pour la mise en oeuvre de l’enquête sur les nécessités de bases (Basic Necessities Survey, BNS) qui a été élaborée à l’origine par Rick Davies (http://mande.co.uk/specialissues/ the-basic-necessities-survey/), puis modifiée et testée sur le terrain par WCS. La BNS modifiée est imparfaite, en ce sens qu’elle ne cherche pas à répondre à toutes les questions qui pourraient être posées sur l’impact des mesures de conservation (ou de développement) sur le bien-être des gens. Mais c’est le noyau parfait d’un programme de suivi des moyens d’existence, parce qu’il fournit des informations essentielles sur le bien-être des gens de leur point de vue au fil du temps, et la mise en oeuvre d’une BNS modifié est assez facile pour ne pas empêcher la collecte d’informations supplémentaires sur les ménages dont un projet de conservation estime avoir besoin pour gérer leurs activités de manière adaptative.
Publisher: WCS
All Governance Metric Publications >>

Email from:
 
Email to:
 
Message:


The person you email to will see the details you enter in the Form field and will be given you IP address for auditing purposes